David Johnson Passed Away Aged 52

Former India pacer David Johnson passed away on Thursday in Bengaluru at the age of 52. He played in two Test matches in 1996, taking three wickets.

David Johnson, a name that might not ring a bell for many contemporary cricket fans, is known for his brief but impactful stint in the mid-90s. Despite his promising start and the ability to bowl at over 95 mph, he struggled with consistency and fitness, which limited his opportunities at the international level.

David Johnson was born on October 16, 1971, in Karnataka. From a young age, he showed a keen interest in sports, especially cricket. Growing up in a cricket-loving nation, it wasn't long before he started playing the game seriously. His passion and dedication towards cricket were evident, even as a child, as he spent countless hours, to improving his skills on the grounds of Bangalore.

His ability to generate pace and swing made him a standout performer in domestic matches. Playing for Karnataka, he delivered several match-winning performances, which eventually caught the eyes of the national selectors.

Johnson's breakthrough came during the early 90s when his consistent performances in the domestic circuit earned him a spot in the Indian national team. His pace and ability to move the ball both ways made him a promising prospect for India, a team traditionally known for its spin bowlers.

David Johnson made his Test debut for India on October 10, 1996, against Australia in Delhi. Although his debut match didn't turn out to be extraordinary in terms of personal statistics, his potential was evident. He bowled with vigor and pace, which added a new dimension to the Indian bowling attack. He then even accompanied the team to the tour of South Africa and played the first Test at Durban. That happened to be his last international outing.

Johnson was primarily a fast bowler who relied on pace and seam movement. His natural out-swingers troubled many batsmen, and his aggressive bowling style was a refreshing change for Indian cricket at that time. During the late 1990s, when Karnataka dominated the domestic circuit, Johnson was part of the pace battery which included Javagal Srinath, Venkatesh Prasad and Dodda Ganesh. Despite his promising start, Johnson's international career was plagued by injuries. These injuries hampered his performance and consistency, making it difficult for him to secure a permanent place in the national team. Moreover, the competition for spots in the team was fierce, and frequent injuries meant he often had to sit out crucial matches.

Even though his international career was short-lived, Johnson's contributions to domestic cricket and his brief stint with the national team are remembered fondly by cricket enthusiasts. He was part of a generation that helped India transition into a team capable of producing quality fast bowlers.

After retiring from professional cricket, David Johnson took up cricket coaching and mentoring young bowlers. He has been involved with various cricket academies and training programs, imparting his knowledge and experience to the next generation of cricketers. Despite not having a long international career, Johnson remains a beloved figure among fans who followed cricket in the 90s. His brief but impactful appearances left a lasting impression, and he continues to be celebrated in cricketing circles.

Johnson was one of the fastest Indian bowlers and his performance in the domestic circuit - his bowling figures of 10 for 152 against Kerala during the 1995-96 Ranji Trophy season - paved his path into the Indian side. Overall, he played 39 first-class matches, picked up 125 wickets at an average of 28.63, and had a strike rate of 47.4. Johnson also has a FC century to his name.

 

Time for a Cull

I (Nasser Hussain) have always said India play better cricket when they play with passion and fire. India can't do things on a cricket field in the old-fashioned way, the quiet, Indian, easy-going way. By and large, Indians are friendly, happy-go-lucky people so it may come naturally to them, but for me, they don't play their best cricket like that anymore. They have to play with passion and fire. It's something Sourav Ganguly gave them in his captaincy and I've seen a lot more of that ability to scrap and fight in this Twenty20 side.

When Andrew Flintoff had a go at Yuvraj Singh, he gave it back to Flintoff by hitting six sixes off the next bowler. Back in England, someone tried to wind up Zaheer Khan through the jelly beans saga and Khan ended up being a man of the series. When India visited Australia in 2001, Ganguly wasn't intimidated by Steve Waugh. Harbhajan Singh bowled them out and the Indian team fought back, down to the last man. That's what I mean by passion and fire.

It's difficult to keep that energy stoked all the time on a long tour but in a T20 tournament lasting two weeks you can do that, especially with the younger boys. It's amazing just what one or two changes can do. In the World T20, India had more than a few changes from the side that I saw playing ODIS against England, and it changed the complexion of the way they played. A team reflects the style and attitude of its captain and the Indian team is starting to reflect Mahendra Singh Dhoni a little bit, in an extravagant, outgoing manner. You saw it on the field all the time, in the celebrations every time a wicket fell, in the support a bowler got even when getting caned.

Maybe it is the nature of Twenty20 cricket that brought out this quality in the Indians, as this is a highly-charged occasion. The way Yuvraj and Dhoni were batting was a massive plus for India. Being in Durban was a lucky bonus for them Africa felt they were playing away from home, and Australia was away from home.

As I watched India strangle Australia, I thought, if they play the final on the same ground the next day, India would win without a problem.

Twenty20 is a game that is suited to India because it's a game of flair and it's a fairly simple game. When batting, you see the ball, you hit the ball. It's not a game where you need to be overly fit, you just need to be talented and you need natural, raw ability. And you can't tell me that Indian cricketers don't have a natural ability. You only have to drive around Mumbai to see young lads play and realize that they are naturally gifted young cricketers. In India and England, for some reason, they don't want to take advantage of that. I think Greg Chappell tried injecting youth into the team, trying to get in players like Suresh Raina and moving out guys like Ganguly. When India played the ODIS against England, I just kept hearing the same old names. Like, with all due respect, Ajit Agarkar; he's a decent cricketer but nothing more. So I think they needed an injection of youth and they've got that in the World T20.

While at the T20, I got into a taxicab and the South African driver said that the one team that should be very good in the next decade is India. People here were used to the Tendulkar’s and the Dravid’s, but for the first time, they saw just how well Yuvraj could bat, what Rohit Sharma could do, how R.P. Singh swung the ball. There's a lot for India to do, but it's an exciting time, it's an interesting time to be watching from the outside.

It is how India handles the gains from this event that will be revealing. The natural reaction is for people to say, get rid of all the senior players. I certainly wouldn't. You don't go from a whole bunch of old players to a whole bunch of young players. It just does not work. You look at any sport, you look at Manchester United, you look at any team. Australia, for instance. I faced a similar situation when Duncan Fletcher and I took over in 1999. We were at rock bottom, we had been knocked out of our own World Cup, we lost to New Zealand and were the world's second-worst side, and we did- n't have the talent the Indian side had. Some of the selectors were saying, get rid of the old guard, and get new players in, but I wanted a few senior players to set the tone in the dressing room. I wanted Alec Stewart, Mike Atherton, Darren Gough, and a few others on my side.

It's a gradual process and you need good, solid, senior players to guide the youngsters. You probably don't need that in a T20 tournament spanning two weeks, but say it's a three-month tour of Australia, where the lads haven't played, or the Pakistan series. When things start going the wrong way, you need the senior pros to guide the younger players.

In Test match cricket, I would retain the gems, the fab four of Dravid, Tendulkar, Ganguly, and Laxman. They are world-class Test players. We saw in the England series that you can still amble on at your pace Indian pace if you want to call it that in the field and get away with it. They dropped some catches, but they got away with that as well. They weren't very mobile on the field, but if Sachin gets his runs, along with Ganguly, Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman and the left-arms bowl, they will continue to be a good Test match side.

But in ODIs, I think, maybe it's time for a bit of a cull. I think India should do it one at a time. As Laxman has now gone from the ODI side, it is probably time for one more to go. The problem with Indian cricket is politics. This is what coaches find, what Chappell found, and what the selectors find. The moment you name one person, half the country is split. You only have to go back to the Ganguly episode. You try and do things for the forward movement of the team and all that it does is create a political situation that divides the country.

The one person I certainly wouldn't give up on yet is Tendulkar. I interviewed him for my newspaper and he still came across as someone desperately in love with the game. He wasn't just doing it for the money or the sponsors or because he's got nothing else to do. Talking to him was like talking to Graham Gooch or Stewart, who played cricket because they absolutely loved the game. I asked Sachin a question about what he was going to do after cricket. He sort of looked at me blankly because this is what life has been for him since he was a 10-year-old.

From what I saw of him in England, I wouldn't certainly call time on Sachin Tendulkar. The only thing with him, and it was noticeable in England, is that his body is beginning to fall apart a little bit because of one-day cricket. He admitted that the first thing that would give way wouldn't be his mind, which looked very sharp and strong, it would be his body. Dravid is one person that India should hold on to for as long as possible in some way.

I'm not sure about ODI, so I won't make any categorical statements about that. But whoever takes over, be it Dhoni or anyone else, will need Dravid around as a shoulder to lean on and also to see how Dravid goes about his business. He's a little bit like Stewart, very meticulous, very organized and a very good example. In these two weeks, the World T20 has found its place in cricket. I'm not of the argument that T20 will eventually take over everything because there's a place in sport for variety. In golf, there's your weekly tour events, the President's Cup, and the Ryder Cup.

It doesn't mean the Ryder Cup is the be-all-and-end-all of everything. You have to go back to your Masters, go back to the weekly tour. It's the same with Twenty20. It will stand like it is, a one-off tournament, played every two years, which is great. Twenty20 will be played domestically or at the start of a series to spice things up, or maybe at the end. I don't think it will kill 50-over cricket or Test cricket. There will be T20 specialists who will suddenly be knocking on the 50-over door like Rohit Sharma has.

T20 cricket will put pressure on the 50-over formats if they realize there is a younger generation that can break through. What T20 will also do is what 50-over cricket has done to Test match cricket. People like Adam Gilchrist and a few others realized they could play the same way in 50-over cricket and Test cricket. T20 will show, Yuvraj Singh and a few others, that they can, if they want to, clear the boundary at any time. It is up to them to choose the time to hit the big sixes. More than any other consequence, I somehow think India might enjoy that the most. Nasser Hussain is a former England cricket captain.

INDIA TODAY OCTOBER 8, 2007

Roger Binny 5 for 40 vs England 2nd Test Match at Leeds in 1986

In the 2nd Test at Leeds in 1986, India beat England by 279 runs and took the lead 2-0 in a three-match series. Dilip Vengarsark and Rojer Binny contributed their extraordinary performances in the victory. In the first inning, Roger Binny took 5 for 40, which helped India bowl England for a mere 102 runs. Rojer Binny took the wickets of Allan Lamb, Mike Gatting, Derek Pringle, John Embury, and Bruce French. Binny also went 2 for 8 in the second inning as well. Let's watch the Roger Binny 5 for 40 spells. 

Read More: Jeff Thomson – The Human Hurricane

Michael Slater's Masterclass vs. South Africa 2nd Test at Sydney in 1993-94.

Michael Slater's Masterclass vs. South Africa 2nd Test at Sydney in 1993-94. A combative and wholehearted cricketer, Michael Slater has played many vital innings for Australia as an opening batsman with his adventurous brand of strokeplay. In 1993-94, the South African team was returning from the sporting wilderness and playing Australia at the SCG. In a cracking test match, South Africa beat Australia by a narrow margin of 5 runs and took the lead 1-0 in the three-match series. In this famous Test match, Michael Slater scored a brilliant 92 off 262 balls, including 5 fours. Allan Donald finally bowled him just short of his third test century.

Throughout his career, Slater was susceptible to the "nervous nineties": of the 23 times he reached a score of 90 in a Test inning, he was dismissed nine times before reaching 100. Michael Slater played 74 Test matches and 42 one-day internationals for Australia. He was a part of the Australian squad that finished as runners-up at the 1996 Cricket World Cup. A specialist right-handed batter as well as a very occasional right-arm medium-pace bowler, Slater represented the New South Wales Blues in Australian domestic cricket and played English county cricket with Derbyshire. Fanie De Villiers was declared player of the match for 4 for 80 and 6 for 43. His performance was against a strong team, away from home, and while defending a very low target. The match umpires were Bill Sheahan, and Steve Randell, as Tv umpire Ian Thomas and match referee Jackie Hendricks. This was test match # 1243.

Ian Bishop Spell vs Pakistan at Brisbane Gabba 1988-89

A 6 feet and 5 inches tall Ian Bishop represented the West Indies cricket team between 1988 and 1998 in Tests and One Day Internationals. Ian Bishop who had serious back problems had twice brought a halt to one of the most promising fast-bowling careers. In this video, you will see Ian Bishop's spell against Pakistan in the 9^th Match of Benson and Hedges World Series at Brisbane Gabba on 7^th Jan 1989. Bishop spell cast 51 runs in 10 overs including 2 wickets. The 21-year-old Bishop was one of the most fearsome bowlers of that era, along with Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, and Malcolm Marshall. Let's get into the video and watch his spell. Javed Miandad and Aamer Malik are batsmen to face him.

He reached 100 test wickets in only 21 Test matches. A powerful fast bowler with a talent for outswing and was among the fastest bowlers in the world before severe back injuries cut him down in 1991. Ian Bishop rehabilitated and made adjustments to his bowling action, returning strongly late in 1992. However, in 1993, he was struck by injuries again, not returning until mid-1995. Thus, what had been at one stage a highly promising career was substantially curtailed. He has forged a successful career as a television commentator. Like several other past players for the West Indies, he is quite vocal about the languishing state of his former team.

Alec Stewart 59 off 36 balls vs Sri Lanka in World Cup 1992

In the 23^rd Match of the Cricket World Cup 1992 at Ballarat, England batsman Alec Stewart scored 59 off 36 balls including 7 fours and 1 six. He smashed all Sri Lankan bowlers and scored the third fastest fifty of the tournament 50 off 332 balls, just behind Martin Crowe, fifty of 30 balls vs Zimbabwe and Inzamam ul Haq 50 off 31 balls vs New Zealand in the semi-final.

Let’s watch Alec Stewart's fastest fifty.

Winning and toss and electing to bat first, England scored 280 for 6 in 50 overs. Ian Botham scored 47, Graeme Hick 41, Neil Fairbrother 63 and Alec Stewart 59 were the major contributors. In reply Sri Lanka all out at 174 runs, and Arjuna Ranatunga scored 36 runs. Chris Lewis took 4 for 30 and was declared player of the match. England won the match by 106 runs and earned the 2 precious points.